Oh sorry :-) you mean the items listed in the quoted text of this thread :-) right ? anyway I will start working on them as much as I can and I will send you a mail on Sunday to tell what I have done of them.
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Gurkan... > > Sorry but what Items you are referring to ? > > On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Hi Mohammad, >> >> Could you do anything about the following items? If not I will start to >> finish them. >> >> I wish that we are able to ready at start of the next week for M1-Release >> VOTE ? >> >> Thanks; >> >> >>>>Hi Gurkan... >> >>>> I noticed that from the SCM mails :-). I will check the mails for >>>>>any other required items. >> >> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 12:55 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi Mohammad; >>> >>> I attacked the two of them in the late night :) >>> >>> 1* I added the *licences* directory for binary distribution of the project. >>> You can reach >> all the distribution related stuffs under the */distribution* directory. >>> 2* I changed the artifact names of the *webbeans-api* and *webbeans-impl* >>> to *openwebbeans-api* >> and *openwebbeans-impl* >>> >>> Its great that you can start any other items. >>> >>> Thanks a lot; >>> >>> /Gurkan >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> From: Mohammad Nour El-Din <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 9:12:13 PM >>> Subject: Re: M1- Release Content >>> >>> Hi Gurkan... >>> >>> If you are not already started to work on these issues, I will start >>> working on them tomorrow. >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 6:38 AM, Kevan Miller <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Jan 11, 2009, at 5:34 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi; >>>>> >>>>> We are planning to release the M1 version of the >>>>> OpenWebBeans . So far we have finished the some parts of the >>>>> specification and the nearly all of the build and release management >>>>> tasks. >>>>> >>>>> M1 release will support the following items; >>>>> >>>>> * Simple WebBeans Support >>>>> * Producer Method Support >>>>> * Event and Observer Support >>>>> * Decorator and Interceptor Support >>>>> * Experimental XML Configuration Support >>>>> * Lookup and Dependency Injection Support >>>>> * Java EE Plugin Support (via ServetContextListener interface) >>>>> >>>>> Remaining parts of the specification that we did not handle in this >>>>> release are the following items; >>>>> >>>>> * Enterprise WebBeans Support >>>>> * JMS WebBeans Support >>>>> * Producer Field Support >>>>> * Servlet Injection Support >>>>> * Inheritance and Realization Support >>>>> * Common Annotations Support >>>>> * Full Support for Validation Checks >>>>> * Passivation Scope and Serialization Operations >>>>> * Full Support for XML Configuration >>>>> * Java EE Container Integration Support (SPI) >>>>> >>>>> ? What do you think about the content of the M1 release ? >>>>> ? Has it enough functionalities to create the release or we may delay it >>>>> to another date for adding more functionality ? >>>>> ? What is your further comments and advices? >>>> >>>> IMO, that's enough for a M1 release. >>>> >>>> I built the current trunk code and took a quick review. Here are some >>>> comments... >>>> >>>> * I think the LICENCE file needs to reference the licences directory. I'd >>>> actually recommend that these be renamed LICENSE >>>> * The NOTICE file does not conform to the requirements of the ASF. See -- >>>> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice (e.g. there's no >>>> COPYRIGHT) >>>> * Also, I doubt that the contents of the NOTICE file is correct. All it >>>> does >>>> is provide attribution to embedded projects. However, some licenses (e.g. >>>> ASL requires that NOTICES be reproduced). >>>> * The binary distributions do not contain the licences directory. The >>>> licenses must either be in the LICENSE file, or you must create a licenses >>>> directory. I actually prefer a single license file, but licenses dirs are >>>> used by some projects. As long as all licenses are available, I'm ok either >>>> way. >>>> * All OpenWebBeans jars/wars/etc. need to contain a META-INF/LICENSE and >>>> META-INF/NOTICE files >>>> * Hmmm. Seems like "webbeans-impl.jar" be "openwebbeans-impl.jar" >>>> >>>> Enough for tonight... >>>> >>>> --kevan >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> ---- >>> Thanks >>> - Mohammad Nour >>> - LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/mnour >>> ---- >>> "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving" >>> - Albert Einstein >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> ---- >> Thanks >> - Mohammad Nour >> - LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/mnour >> ---- >> "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving" >> - Albert Einstein >> >> >> >> > > > > -- > ---- > Thanks > - Mohammad Nour > - LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/mnour > ---- > "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving" > - Albert Einstein > -- ---- Thanks - Mohammad Nour - LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/mnour ---- "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving" - Albert Einstein
