I have categorized the our issues in the jira.
/Gurkan ________________________________ From: Mark Struberg <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2009 12:22:16 PM Subject: Re: AW: how to cope with 'additional' features of OpenWebBeans over the Spec btw we actually _have_ such an additional feature already ;) .) java.util.Date, java.sql.Date, java.sql.Time, java.sql.Timestamp or java.util.Calendar must not only be written in a format java.text.DateFormat.getDateTimeInstance().parse() understands, but may also be written in xs:dateTime format. I checked the PDR, this has still not found it's way into the spec... LieGrue, strub --- Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected]> schrieb am Sa, 24.1.2009: > Von: Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected]> > Betreff: Re: AW: how to cope with 'additional' features of OpenWebBeans over > the Spec > An: [email protected] > Datum: Samstag, 24. Januar 2009, 19:58 > Ok, Mark :) You would also create the jira tickets for > features under the release version (M1or M2 ..M5) you > think that will provide these functionalities. > > Thanks; > > /Gurkan > > > > ________________________________ > From: Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2009 9:05:45 AM > Subject: Re: AW: how to cope with 'additional' > features of OpenWebBeans over the Spec > > Gurkan, you are absolutely right that there is currently no > need to force such features. > > But on the other hand, there will be the point when we will > like to add one or the others of them. And since I'm a > little forgetfully, I better write things down immediately > ;) > > LieGrue, > strub > > > --- Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected]> schrieb > am Sa, 24.1.2009: > > > Von: Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected]> > > Betreff: Re: AW: how to cope with 'additional' > features of OpenWebBeans over the Spec > > An: [email protected] > > Datum: Samstag, 24. Januar 2009, 17:48 > > For me ,content is looking good Mark. But do we have > to > > put such a content before the implementation contains > those > > futures ? > > > > I think that firstly we have to order our priorities > for > > the jira tasks that are waiting to be solved. > Currently, > > there are two milstone versions, namely M1 and M2 in > the > > jira. I will add other milstone versions, M3, > M4, M5 and > > finally the 1.0.0 version. After that we may > partitioned the > > our issues over these versions. Before each > milestone is > > released, we can work on the issues it has. > > > > What do you think guys about the above process? > > > > * 5 milestone versions are enough before the 1.0.0 > version? > > * If you think that we follow another path for our > > releasing process, please give us an information about > it. > > > > Thanks; > > > > /Gurkan > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > > To: [email protected] > > Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2009 7:47:09 AM > > Subject: AW: how to cope with 'additional' > features > > of OpenWebBeans over the Spec > > > > I'd like to add a site (+functionality behind) > with the > > following content: > > > > -------------- > > Extensions over the JSR-299 Specification > > > > This section contains a list of functionality in > > OpenWebBeans > > which is not covered by the official specification. > > > > OpenWebBeans is fully compatible with the JSR-299 > > standard if > > the default configuration is being used. > Nevertheless > > some parts > > of the behaviour may be changed and some > functionality > > is > > additionally available. > > > > Please note that using the mentioned functionality > can > > cause > > that your application may not be run on other > WebBeans > > implementations. > > > > OpenWebBeans may be configured that a WARNING > message > > will be logged > > whenever any of this additional functionality is > being > > used. > > -------------- > > > > The configuration may be done with > openwebbeans.properties > > as explained below. > > > > > > LieGrue, > > strub > > > > > > --- Mark Struberg <[email protected]> schrieb am > Sa, > > 24.1.2009: > > > > > Von: Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > > > Betreff: how to cope with 'additional' > > features of OpenWebBeans over the Spec > > > An: [email protected] > > > Datum: Samstag, 24. Januar 2009, 14:56 > > > Hi! > > > > > > I'd like to know how we should cope with > features > > we > > > implement in OpenWebBeans which are _not_ > specified in > > > JSR-299 but are quite handy to have. > > > > > > 1.) Do we like to have such 'additional > > features' > > > at all? > > > I'd say yes, e.g. the injection of java > primitives > > and > > > wrappers for constructors and producers would be > very > > > valuable in praxis. Also a few optional > configurations > > like > > > to use a different name for 'beans.xml' > > > > > > 2.) If so, how do we document it? > > > My preference would be to add a page for each > > extension in > > > src/site/apt/extensions > > > > > > LieGrue, > > > strub
