>>KM :You used the words "final specification". Just want to be clear that
the current specification is a "public draft". Which means that there
can be (will be) changes in the future.

Thanks for clarification of the statement. 

/Gurkan



________________________________
From: Kevan Miller <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 4:37:12 PM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Change API package structure


On Jan 27, 2009, at 8:03 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:

> Hi guys,
> 
> As you know , we would like to create our first release in Friday. There is 
> one point that I like to discuss;
> 
> In the final specification, API package names are changed from the 
> javax.webbeans.* to different package names. For example, javax.inject, 
> javax.context. etc...After rethinking, I want to update the current API to 
> reflect these changes.
> 
> What do you think about reflecting these changes in M1-Release? Should we 
> reflect it in the M1-Release or defer it to the M2-Release?
> 
> If there is no opposite idea I will go and update the API to reflect the 
> current specification requirements.
> 
> WDYT?

Agreed. M1 should be updated to match the latest public draft specification.

You used the words "final specification". Just want to be clear that the 
current specification is a "public draft". Which means that there can be (will 
be) changes in the future.

--kevan



      

Reply via email to