getting all TCK tests working will be a lot of work ;) But I think we are on track now, since we have something we can put our hands on.
My plans for the next time: a.) digging in to the TCK to get more and more working b.) setup Geronimo with OWB + writing SPI for getting the TransactionalEntityManager and stuff from OpenEJB. But as said yesterday, I will not have much time this week since I'm on skiing holidays until saturday. So don't hesitate to hack the TCKs :) LieGrue, strub --- Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected]> schrieb am Sa, 28.2.2009: > Von: Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected]> > Betreff: Re: TCK next steps? > An: [email protected] > Datum: Samstag, 28. Februar 2009, 11:35 > Hi Mark; > > I really appreciated your work about TCK implementation. > Its very good start to check TCK tests. As you said, I have > faced lots of exceptions, skipping tests etc while I was > running the tests. I have resolved some of them but it takes > lots of time, because I had to dig into the details via > Eclipse debugger. I have also some questions that I am going > to ask in the @webbeansdev list. > > I realized that when TestNG throws exception before > starting to tests, it simply skipped the tests. I debugged > exceptional cases, I noticed that some of the concepts > maybe not understand by us or jboss guys :) > > > Moreover, some tests are written for the "Enterprise > Beans" that OpenWebBeans do not handle them, so tests > throw exceptions. > > I think that in the minumum our implementation must pass > the core tests that are related with the our implemented > artifacts, such as "Contexts, Injection, Resolution, > Observers etc." > > Moreover, we have to implement the other parts of the > specification, including Enterprise Beans, JMS and > remaining XML stuff to run TCK tests fully. Actually we are > on the very good track. Maybe you can continue to implement > our TCK if you wish and I try to continue to finish the > remaining parts of the specification. > > What do you think guys? I think we may run a bit faster :) > > Help is very appreciated! > > Thanks; > > /Gurkan > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2009 1:46:30 AM > Subject: TCK next steps? > > Hi Gurkan! > > It seems we have been working on the same part - but your > implementation is a _lot_ more readable than my quickly > hacked one ;) > > One thing which I also experienced so far: There are a LOT > of things to be resolved at the @BeforeClass initialisation. > This is the reason why most of the tests are simply skipped. > > > LieGrue, > strub > > PS: I will not have that much time the next week since > I'm skiing.
