Hi and welcome Berthold! There are a few historic facts which lead to the JSR-299
a.) Seam provided an easy way to combine JSF and JPA b.) The EJB specs IOC part was very weak compared with e.g. Spring c.) JSR-299 is targeted at J2EE servers primary, but we like to also provide a lot of the functionality for ServletEngines and maybe also for JDK standalone only. LieGrue, strub --- Berthold Scheuringer <[email protected]> schrieb am Mi, 11.3.2009: > Von: Berthold Scheuringer <[email protected]> > Betreff: project status > An: [email protected] > Datum: Mittwoch, 11. März 2009, 18:29 > Hi all, > > I´m pretty new to OpenWebBeans and don´t know that much > about the actual > project status (especially considering the latest revise of > the > JSR-299 spec). > > Therefore I have following questions: > > 1) first of all the most important question: will > OpenWebBeans move onward > implementing the JSR 299 considering the latest revise of > the spec (where it > seems to be more like an extension to EJB 3.x ) ? > > > 2) second (not that important) question: if OpenWebBeans > will implement the > last spec - will the name still remain > (or will then also a renaming be done toward "Java Contexts > and Dependency > Injection") > > > Thanks in advance for answering my pretty fundamental > questions. > > Regards, > > Berthold >
