sorry, ment IRC anyway ... And yes the outcome and important points are always brought back to this very list.
But sometimes it's easier to not have a 6 hour delay between 2 thoughts :) LieGrue, strub --- James Carman <[email protected]> schrieb am Sa, 18.4.2009: > Von: James Carman <[email protected]> > Betreff: Re: AW: OWB modularisation > An: [email protected] > Datum: Samstag, 18. April 2009, 14:15 > I can be available. Do you guys > want to talk via the IRC channel or > ICQ? I don't even have an ICQ account anymore, I > don't think. What > about Skype? One thing's for sure, we need to bring > our discussion > results back to this list. Doing things behind the > scenes and > off-list is not the ASF way. I'm sure there's no > problem with having > off-list discussions, but we just have to make sure we keep > folks in > the loop. > > On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Gurkan, James I don't know if you can find some spare > time this evening. I will be off now but back @ 19:00 CEST > in ICQ. > > > > Would be cool if we could discuss a possibly new > structure and a few M2 questions quickly. > > > > LieGrue, > > strub > > > > --- Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > schrieb am Sa, 18.4.2009: > > > >> Von: Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > >> Betreff: Re: AW: OWB modularisation > >> An: [email protected] > >> Datum: Samstag, 18. April 2009, 10:37 > >> > >> Hi! > >> > >> The JSF separation is only the beginning. > >> > >> The plugin will be extended to allow plugable > resource > >> injection, field injection, etc > >> > >> The OWB core should only contain SE stuff with no > further > >> dependencies, so JPA, EJB etc should go into > plugins. > >> > >> Finally I'd like to think about a new structure of > our > >> modules, something like this: > >> > >> . > >> |-- distribution > >> |-- webbeans-api > >> |-- webbeans-impl (core with only SE > functionality) > >> |-- src/site (for the main documentation) > >> |-- samples > >> | |-- guess > >> | '-- chatapp > >> |-- plugins > >> | |-- webbeans-jsf > >> | |-- webbeans-jpa (@PersistenceUnit, etc > >> with simple SPI impl) > >> | '-- webbeans-ejb (basic EJB stuff with > >> SPI definition) > >> |-- integration > >> | |-- webbeans-openejb > >> | |-- webbeans-openjpa > >> | '-- webbeans-hibernate > >> |-- bundles > >> | |-- webbeans-geronimo > >> | |-- webbeans-tomcat > >> | |-- webbeans-swing > >> | '-- webbeans-glassfish > >> '-- webbeans-tck (with webbeans-geronimo as test > container > >> for full TCK) > >> > >> I think we should let the default > MetaDataDiscoveryService > >> implementation with it's javassist and > scannotation > >> dependencies for webbeans-impl to not > overcomplicate the > >> tests. If one likes to not use it, he can still > exclude > >> those dependencies and use another mechanism > instead. > >> > >> I'n not sure about the bundles thingy, because > this can > >> also go into e.g. geronimo itself. > >> > >> Feel free to comment pros and cons of this > structure. > >> > >> Another question: Gurkan, what plans do you have > for M2? > >> I'd like to checkin the PluginLoader asap. Maybe > without > >> the directory rework, but it should definitely go > into M2, > >> so I'd wait another 2 weeks for things settle > down. > >> > >> LieGrue, > >> strub > >> > >> --- Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected]> > >> schrieb am Sa, 18.4.2009: > >> > >> > Von: Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected]> > >> > Betreff: Re: AW: OWB modularisation > >> > An: [email protected] > >> > Datum: Samstag, 18. April 2009, 8:01 > >> > Yup. it is good idea to have separate > >> > project for jsf related codes. > >> > > >> > In the mean time, we have to work on to > create > >> > M2 release :) > >> > > >> > Requirements for next steps M3, M4, M5 > release > >> > ------------------------------------------- > >> > We have to implement all of the specs with > exception > >> > > >> > * XML definition > >> > * Interceptor and Decorator definition > >> > * EJB definition > >> > > >> > Because these topics are uncertain and that > they can > >> be > >> > carried to the other specifications. > >> > > >> > M2 Content > >> > ------------------------------------------ > >> > I will send a detailed information about the > M2 > >> > release content and dates in a couple of > days. Please > >> you > >> > also think about what can be go inside into > the M2 > >> release. > >> > > >> > Thanks; > >> > > >> > Gurkan > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > ________________________________ > >> > From: Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > >> > To: [email protected]; > >> > [email protected] > >> > Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2009 1:40:50 AM > >> > Subject: AW: OWB modularisation > >> > > >> > > >> > I now also fixed a few issues in the guess > sample: > >> > > >> > .) workaround for OWB-90 > >> > .) add dependency to openwebbeans-jsf > >> > .) improved logging in the PluginLoader > >> > > >> > LieGrue, > >> > strub > >> > > >> > --- [email protected] > >> > <[email protected]> > >> > schrieb am Fr, 17.4.2009: > >> > > >> > > Von: [email protected] > >> > <[email protected]> > >> > > Betreff: OWB modularisation > >> > > An: [email protected] > >> > > Datum: Freitag, 17. April 2009, 22:56 > >> > > > >> > > Hi folks! > >> > > > >> > > Today ran very well - I finally got > enough power > >> to > >> > > introduce a plugin mechanism for > OpenWebBeans. > >> > > > >> > > So webbeans-impl doesn't contain any > JSF > >> specific > >> > code > >> > > anymore! > >> > > All this has been moved over a special > >> webbeans-jsf > >> > module. > >> > > > >> > > The mechanism uses the > java.util.ServiceLoader > >> > > functionality. So adding a now plugin is > easy: > >> simply > >> > drop > >> > > the JAR into the classpath ;) > >> > > > >> > > Please take a glimpse at > >> > > > >> > > http://ns1.backwork.net/git/openwebbeans.git > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > If there re no objections on how I > implemented > >> it, > >> > then > >> > > I'll check this into SVN tomorrow > morning! > >> > > > >> > > LieGrue, > >> > > strub > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
