Thanks Matthias! Very interesting proposal!
This is more or less a SE subset of JSR-299 with different annotations (or in other words, Spring core). Making all the non-JDK-only parts optional is not mentioned in the JSR-299 Spec but implemented not only by us but also by the JBoss RI. What I miss from the first glance: Bindings and StereoTypes. But the JavaDoc is _really_ thin, so this can't be all? This also explains googles try to push JSR-299 in the J2EE direction... What's next? Imho there is no place for 2 'standard' injections. at least not in javax.inject ;) One for sure: Spring and guice also have all the 'fat' functionality like @PersistenceContext support, etc but they have it split from the core. Maybe we should also split JSR-299 in 'core' and 'additional functionality'? LieGrue, strub ----- Ursprüngliche Mail ---- > Von: Matthias Wessendorf <[email protected]> > An: [email protected] > CC: Pete Muir <[email protected]> > Gesendet: Dienstag, den 5. Mai 2009, 19:34:50 Uhr > Betreff: FYI: javax.inject* standard ... > > FYI: > http://google-code-updates.blogspot.com/2009/05/javaxinjectinject.html > > what does this mean to JSR 299 ? > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
