>>Great :), but I really need to understand what is the effect of the >>new JSR of std Java Dependency Injection API(s) on us ? I think you consider about JSR 330. IMO, no effect, becuase it is created for using in the ava SE environment, otherwise JSR-299 is more specific to Java EE.
Actually, this API maybe implemented on top of the OWB. We may be thinking of creating another extension that implements JSR-330 APIs using OWB :) Thanks; --Gurkan 2009/6/9 Mohammad Nour El-Din <[email protected]> > Great :), but I really need to understand what is the effect of the > new JSR of std Java Dependency Injection API(s) on us ? > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Mark Struberg<[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi and welcome back Mohammad :) > > > > You don't missed much, since the spec changed heavily and we also have to > reread it once again... > > > > LieGrue, > > strub > > > > --- Mohammad Nour El-Din <[email protected]> schrieb am Di, > 9.6.2009: > > > >> Von: Mohammad Nour El-Din <[email protected]> > >> Betreff: Re: Development Next Steps > >> An: [email protected] > >> Datum: Dienstag, 9. Juni 2009, 9:16 > >> Hi... > >> > >> I know I have not been active the last period, but > >> thanks God at > >> last I got a home internet connection and I can get back > >> working on > >> OWB. I would be more interested in integrating OWB with > >> OpenEJB. > >> > >> I need to re-read the specs and it going to take me till > >> the end of > >> this week, I hope to more active this time :). > >> > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Mark Struberg<[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > Hi Gurkan! > >> > > >> > Should we still stick to our approach to split non > >> javaSE parts into plugins? I'd prefer it, but not sure if it > >> is still possible. So since now all 'heavy' parts are done, > >> I could start working on getting the plugins finished. > >> > > >> > Also: did you already remove all parts from the > >> 'official' API which have been dropped from the Spec like > >> Observers? > >> > Do we like to drop the functionality internally too? > >> :( > >> > If not (which I prefer), we should start a new > >> 'owb-internal-api' module. > >> > > >> > LieGrue, > >> > strub > >> > > >> > --- Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected]> > >> schrieb am Mo, 8.6.2009: > >> > > >> >> Von: Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected]> > >> >> Betreff: Development Next Steps > >> >> An: [email protected] > >> >> Datum: Montag, 8. Juni 2009, 18:53 > >> >> Hi guys; > >> >> > >> >> As you already know, we have succesfully published > >> our M2 > >> >> version. Altough a spec changes a lot from the > >> last draft > >> >> version, I think we are on the good track. > >> >> > >> >> In the mean time I have sent June board report. > >> In > >> >> this report I stated one point, from report: > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> NOT : Actually, last draft specification imposes > >> on an > >> >> implementations > >> >> that it must be tightly integrated with a Java EE > >> >> Container's internals > >> >> , such that integration with an EJB 3.1 Container, > >> Servlet > >> >> Container, > >> >> Managed Beans etc. So, we have to work closely on > >> the > >> >> respective Apache > >> >> teams to push the implementation. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> WDYT about the next items ? How could we proceed? > >> >> > >> >> Currently, I have been changing OWB API's for > >> obeying to > >> >> the current draft specification. Moreover, there > >> are > >> >> mainly the following points that have to be > >> implemented as > >> >> next > >> >> > >> >> 1* EJBs > >> >> 2* Resources > >> >> 3* Bean Provider SPI > >> >> 4* Java Servlet, Managed Bean integration > >> >> > >> >> I will try to integrate OpenEJB with OWB. But this > >> will be > >> >> on a collapsed ear level (ejbs can be placed on > >> the war > >> >> deployment, ejb3.1 stuff). To real integration > >> with EJBs, we > >> >> have to work closely with OpenEJB teams. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> Thanks; > >> >> > >> >> --Gurkan > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> ---- > >> Thanks > >> - Mohammad Nour > >> - LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/mnour > >> ---- > >> "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you > >> must keep moving" > >> - Albert Einstein > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > ---- > Thanks > - Mohammad Nour > - LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/mnour > ---- > "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving" > - Albert Einstein > -- Gurkan Erdogdu http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
