Awesome! talk later than. thanks Gurkan
2009/8/4, Mark Struberg <[email protected]>: > > Hi Gurkan! > > First, thanks for your answer! > 2nd, enjoy your holidays :) > > I already found section 5.3.3 which answered my question. > In general this usecase is a valid one, and is also covered in the TCK. > > Locally, I did a really dirty hack by returning Object.class as upper > boundary from the type erasure for now (in ClassUtil#getClazz). > I didn't check this in, but now I'm at least able to continue with the TCK > hacking. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > ----- Original Message ---- >> From: Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2009 1:32:07 PM >> Subject: Re: generic classes allowed as bean type? >> >> more on this, type variable is not valid bean injection type. you can >> not resolve any bean to injection point with type variables. >> >> hope this helps; >> >> 2009/8/2, Mark Struberg : >> > >> > Hi! >> > >> > While trying to run the TCK suite, I came across a problem while parsing >> > the >> > class >> > >> > public class MockCreationalContextimplements CreationalContext; >> > >> > with WebBeansLifecycle#applicationStarted >> > >> > The problem is the generic type T (a javax.reflect.generic.TypeVariable) >> > which doesn't resolve to a 'real' class and since crashes OWB. >> > >> > How do we solve this? From reading the spec I cannot even say if this is >> > a >> > valid bean type at all. >> > On the on hand it is not listed in the taxative list of valid bean >> > types. >> > On the other hand, an example with an _applied_ type is shown in the >> > spec >> > (class BookShop implements Shop) >> > >> > Gurkan, are you online tomorrow evening? >> > >> > LieGrue, >> > strub >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> -- >> Gurkan Erdogdu >> http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com > > > > > -- Gurkan Erdogdu http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
