Hi; Why would you like to drop our module?
I think we must use our module api instead of using theirs. We can not depend any api for our implementation. If you see other projects in Apache, you see lot of API modules for Java EE specs. If you look at jboss impl. it is also Apache License but it is copyrighted by jboss.(if you look at source code, there is an @Copyright etc..) So, I would like to stick with our apis including at-inject and webbeans-api. Thanks; --Gurkan 2009/10/14 Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > Hi! > > Bob and Jason today pushed the tagged v1 of the atinject-api to mavens > central repository. > > I will again check the license, but think it was released under ASL2. So we > could now theoretically drop our atinject-api module and use the one from > central instead. > > TODOs: > .) again check the license > .) adopt LICENSE and NOTICE files where needed > .) drop our the atinject-api module > > anything else? > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > -- Gurkan Erdogdu http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
