Hi Gurkan, actually I am using the maven artifact from http://download.java.net/maven/1/javax.ejb/. Because CDI can be used in environments not having a full javaee stack, I would like to use CDI and thereby the javax.interceptor package without having the ejb stuff in the classpath too. Is the javax.ejb package also necessary for running OWB?
br, Sven 2009/11/1 Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected]> > Hi; > > General > -------------------- > In Java EE 5, interceptors are delivered via seperate EJB3 interceptors > specification. I think that this will be the same in the Java EE 6 or it > will be contained in its own Java Interceptors Specification that is > separately developed from EJB3.1 specification. It will be go into > "javax.interceptor.*" package not "javax.annotation." > > OWB Side > -------------------- > > Firstly I assume that "ejb-api" --> "geronimo-interceptor_3.0_spec.jar" > > *webbeans-api* module contains "javax.interceptor.InteceptorBinding" and > "javax.interceptor.Interceptor" classes. They are removed when those classes > will be developed in new version of the "geronimo-interceptor jar." > > Currently webbeans-impl uses "geronimo-interceptor-api" to configure > interceptors that are defined in the EJB specification on "ManagedBeans" > . So, if you use OWB in tomcat or jetty then "interceptor" jar must be on > the classpath. If you look at pom.xml, it is defined as optional. If you > create a web application with OWB and your container already contains > "interceptor" jar on its classpath, no need to add "interceptor" jar into > your war archive. > > For example, if you look at the "ejb-sample", its "geronimo-interceptor" > jar is defined as "provided" becuase "OpenEJB in Tomcat " already provides > "interceptor" jar. But if you look at guess or reservation sample, > "interceptor" jar is bundled with war because Standalone Tomcat or Jetty > does not contain "interceptor" jar. > > Hope this helps; > > Thanks; > > --Gurkan > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Sven Linstaedt <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Sun, November 1, 2009 3:35:40 PM > Subject: Standalone artifact for javax.interceptor.* > > Hi, does anyone know whether the package javax.interceptor.* is going to > become a standalone artifact like it happened to javax.annotation.* ? > Currently you have to deliver the whole ejb-api, when deploying a war with > OWB in a simple servlet container like tomcat or jetty. > > br, Sven > > > > >
