Hi Aiko, On 4/6/06, Aiko Satsuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is this large of a performance hit typical of the DbPersistedEngine? Or > does it sound like I have something drastically wrong? > What are some ways I could increase its throughput? I expected a somewhat > slower response time—but not to this degree. Any thoughts on the matter are > appreciated. I am unsure of this result is normal.
Hi Aiko, this result is entirely normal. DB persistence is heavy. InMemory persistence is of course, the fastest. OpenWFE, for simplicity, stores XML as CLOB, hence the name "xlob". If you spot any potential perf improvements, they're welcome. Personally I always use regular file persistence or in memory persistence. That's a reason why db persistence might be left behind. OpenWFE data model is not exactly suited for database persistence, but it might change, I've got ideas, but that's for later in the year. Best regards, -- John Mettraux -///- http://jmettraux.openwfe.org ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 _______________________________________________ OpenWFE - Open source WorkFlow Engine OpenWFE-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openwfe-users
