Definitely. I think Rufus is already good. Slight concern is about complexity of expression language, which I am sure, need not be a show-stopper.
I also need your help to understand the concurrent-iterator a little better. If you provide a couple of examples (similar that of earlier case), it would be of great help to me. One immediate feedback is - Rufus' Ruby syntax is great idea, against XML, in fact one very good demonstration of domain-specific languages using Ruby. Thanks for bringing it to us. With regards, Harshal On Mar 5, 11:26 am, "John Mettraux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 3:23 PM, harshal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Thanks John. > > > I shall proceed with these suggestions. > > If you have ideas/suggestions about this soap participant, I'll be > glad to implement/incorporate them if they make sense. Feedback is > good. > > Best regards, > > -- > John Mettraux -///- http://jmettraux.openwfe.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OpenWFEru dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
