Hi Pat, On 8/10/07, cappelaere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > John, > As you know this is a hot topic in the Wf-XML area. We are currently > looking at a RESTFul approach to it and I owe you a document (coming > soon). Short of sharing the document that is currently half-baked, > here is my current thoughts: > > A remote engine is REST-accessible and any activity can easily launch > a remote process. > Calling activity would have access to remote process status & data > (using a GET). > > Better, this calling activity could be exposed as a URI somehow and > subscribe to process event notification. Calling activity waits for > response, gets the message and continues on. > This does not appear as a huge stumbling block...
Indeed, maybe I could write a stub of a participant that triggers a webservice REST or SOAP and waits for the reply. How do you envision the reply part ? (I will read the document to find out and maybe comment in this thread). TTYS, cheers, -- John Mettraux -///- http://jmettraux.openwfe.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OpenWFEru users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
