Hi John,
>>>Sorry not to be able to help you more. I tried to reply in the best
>>>way possible with your given input.
Your feedback and support helps me really !
Then problem with companyDefiner was the line:
workitem.attributes = {"field1" => ['4','3','5','9']}
It looks like that the other workitems are deleted.
For some other tests I tried to use the log expressing but in the
openwfe.log file a unknown expression 'log' exception is logged.
Is it necessary to make some additional imports or configurations ?
Best regards
On 30 Okt., 15:35, "John Mettraux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/30/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I found one reason of the problem.
> > Below :on_value => "${f:comp}" does'nt work as exspected because
> > I make a false assumption.
> > I thought that the field comp is part of the current workitem.
> > The participant "call" companyDefiner implicite 'consume' the field
> > comp.
> > If I comment the line with "companyDefiner" out then :on_value => "$
> > {f:comp}" is working properly
> > Is it normal that workitem fields are lost leaving a participant ?
>
> No.
>
> > What is the scope and the lifetime of workitem fields ?
>
> Scope : the workitem. Lifetime : as long as not erased from the workitem.
>
> > Are there different scopes or lifetimes of workitem fields ?
>
> No. But when you use a concurrence, there is a workitem for each
> branch of the concurrence.
>
> There are rules about how workitems are merged back (into one) at the
> end of a concurrence or a concurrent-iterator (please
> readhttp://openwferu.rubyforge.org/rdoc/classes/OpenWFE/ConcurrenceExpres...)
>
> Maybe your issue is about defining a field in a concurrence branch...
> But I've reread your code example and the field "comp" is set at the
> end of the process definition, it's thus not visible.
>
> Your "companyDefiner" participant seems not to touch your "comp" field at all.
>
> Sorry not to be able to help you more. I tried to reply in the best
> way possible with your given input.
>
> > This is potentially also related to my previous question:
>
> > Are somewhere some examples using complex dollor notations to access
> > a value in a complex workitem attribute ( a array of hash maps )
> > within the process definition ( usefull in "if", "case", ...
> > expressions ) ?
>
> I replied to that at
> :http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users/msg/5f9037b8f7889e17
>
> Best regards,
>
> --
> John Mettraux -///- http://jmettraux.openwfe.org
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"OpenWFEru users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
