Hi John, hi All !!
i have a small question here because i'm confused about usage and
capabilities of the expressions in the subject.
To be more clear (a simplier version of) my process def follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<process-definition name="main_process" revision="1">
<sequence>
<participant ref="preparecontrolvalue" />
<iterator on-value="${f:control_field}" to-variable="j">
<subprocess ref="my_sub_proc" activity="do_something_with_j" />
</iterator>
</sequence>
<process-definition name="my_sub_proc">
<sequence>
<participant ref="someone" />
<participant ref="somewhat" />
</sequence>
</process-definition>
</process-definition>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I ask you please to help me understand if it is possible to use
similar structures to get a
variable numer of iterations or if i should use other kind of schema.
The problem is that at this moment such a mechanism don't work,
whatever value is put into
control_value when the workitem is sent to "preparecontrolvalue"
partecipant, i tried simple values
like "1,2,3", but nothing to do.
I guess it is due to the fact that at the parsing time on-value is ""
because at that moment control_field is empty, but i'd like
to understand better if this is designed to be so or not.
Anyway, suggestions to get varable length iterations in different
way(s) are VERY WELCOME !!!!!! :)
Thanks in advance to everyone will read this.
Tomaso
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"OpenWFEru users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
