Sorry, i was wrong.
But it's all the day that i'm fighting with a concurrent-iterator who has
subprocesses as children
and my head has gone away. May be tomorrow she'll come back...
Sorry again
Tom
On Nov 12, 2007 11:55 PM, John Mettraux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 13, 2007 7:50 AM, Tomaso Tosolini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Hi John, hi All,
> > please can you help me with the test attached: it a small modification
> to
> > the one present
> > in ft_2b_concurrence.rb.
> >
> >
> > Since it fails to me i can't understand:
> >
> > concurrence {
> > N.times { set [...] }
> > }
> >
> > concurrence {
> > N.times { sequence { set []; participant } }
> > }
> >
> > are different only in that in the first exp "set" is child of
> "concurrence"
> > while in the second "sequence" is child of "concurrence",
> > but it should not be so important, true?
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> what does the log or the error journal say ? Seems like the
> participant "alpha" is not registered.
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> --
> John Mettraux -///- http://jmettraux.openwfe.org
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"OpenWFEru users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
