On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 5:30 AM, J B <[email protected]> wrote: > > 1. PR is attached and a form field is completed with the PR's dollar value. > Manager is selected from drop down box. > 2. PR is routed to that manager's work queue and he/she is notified via > email. > 3. Manager approves or disapproves. > - Approve: see step 4. > - Reject: PR is marked rejected and returned to initiator. > 4. If dollar value is greater than $10000, PR is routed to CFO for approval. > If not, it goes directly to number 6. > 5. If CFO approves, capex is routed to Accounting for approval. If not, > rejection as above. > 6. If Accounting approves, PR is marked as complete and submitter is > notified. If not, rejection. > 7. Complete.
Hello again, I've uploaded something at http://gist.github.com/73813 It explores some variants (like using a subprocess definition, ...) Questions are welcome. "attaching" documents to process instances is IMHO a bad thing : we live in a web/internet world, everything should have a URI (IRI), even if it's just a path to a document in the forgotten Z: drive or an identifier in some Lotus Notes drawer. Like, in programmation, we tend not to copy each value, but we pass pointers, pass the URL to stuff / documents, let workflow/BPM stuff be independent of the content/record/document management stuff. > As you can see, these are fairly simple workflows based on responsbilities > assigned by role. We essentially have a many-to-many relationship between > users and roles. Ruote process definitions only know about participants (and subprocesses), users and roles emerge later (sorry, no convention over configuration here). > I was hoping someone might give me a helpful push in terms of accomplishing > these sorts of flows in ruote. I suspect an example of doing this will be > just the push I need. I believe based on other threads regarding ruote and > passenger being a no-go, I'm going to attempt this with ruote-rest (unless > JRuby does away with this problem). If you just need a small departmental workflow engine, MRI with a single Mongrel might be sufficient. Best regards, -- John Mettraux - http://jmettraux.wordpress.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" group. to post : send email to [email protected] to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected] more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
