Hi John, It was lack of understanding of Ruote internals that made me think of it. I was hopeful that you would have made sufficient provisions, as it turned out to be. :-)
Thanks again. ./harshal On May 4, 12:25 pm, John Mettraux <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 4:14 PM, harshal <[email protected]> wrote: > > > One more small doubt: What if '20090403-jashiyakoro' and '20090403- > > jashiyakoro' launched on same date and still running, would their > > names not collide? Should it be '<date>-<id>' or '<timestamp>-<id>'? > > Hello Harshal, > > it's a kind of timestamp. > > All the details of wfid generation are at > :http://github.com/jmettraux/ruote/blob/82fbd77da1c74150026e0faa5f152b... > > (with a bit of study or questioning, you could even learn how to plug > your own process instance generation routine) > > What makes you think I would implement a system where process > instances are identified with non-unique names/labels/ids ? > > -- > John Mettraux - http://jmettraux.wordpress.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" group. to post : send email to [email protected] to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected] more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
