On May 15, 6:28 pm, choda <[email protected]> wrote: > On May 15, 4:29 pm, John Mettraux <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Marc, > > Hello John > > > thanks for your remarks about the documentation. Any help/feedback is > > welcome. > > Let me correct what I said, because of course, just after my first > post, > I went back to the documentation and found out that they're actually > is > an example of how to use a worklist... it's in the mano_tracker.rb > example, > but at first glance I didn't realize that a "store" is a synonym for > "worklist". > > Be sure I'll be glad to help I have the chance in the future (until > you get bored > of my remarks :) )
Hi again. Talking about feedback, I've been looking into the the mano_tracker.rb I mentionned as it is given as an example for using a YamlParticipant. Seeing the date of its last modification, the script is a bit outdated, and needs a few minors corrections (but nothing serious) before it can be run properly. After this few corrections, it works fine if you use the HashParticipant registration that is commented out instead the YamlParticipant registration. But if you try with the YamlParticipant, you get the following error: "mano_tracker.rb:154: undefined method `each' for #<OpenWFE::YamlParticipant:...> (NoMethodError)" Indeed 'each' is no part of this participant public instance, but I've given a look at http://openwferu.rubyforge.org/rdoc/classes/OpenWFE/YamlParticipant.html, its parent class http://openwferu.rubyforge.org/rdoc/classes/OpenWFE/YamlFileStorage.html (DEPRECATED), http://openwferu.rubyforge.org/rdoc/classes/OpenWFE/StoreParticipantMixin.html (since I assume its relevant) The latter clearly indicates that the it store participant is supposed to behave similarly to a hash, and so provide an 'each' method. I could go into details (I've looked at the other available methods, but none seems to quickly give the expected result), but let's make it simple and blunt: is the example or some part of the documentation completely deprecated ? I think it might be useful to correct it since it's pointed out as an example (and probably shouldn't take long...) Regards Marc P.S : I'm currently looking into the solutions you both mentionned and will hopefully give some feedback soon, though the AMQP stuff looks really promising... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" group. to post : send email to [email protected] to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected] more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
