On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 4:49 AM, John Mettraux <[email protected]>wrote:

>
> Hello list,
>
> I was just thinking about ruote-amqp. It's an essential part of ruote,
> well it's rather an essential item to make ruote relevant in a
> message-ish world.
>
> So at first many thanks to Kenneth for starting it (and all the xmpp
> work that came before), and thanks to Jason and Jordan for making
> ruote-amqp step up to ruote 2.0.
>
> I'm sure you guys have already thought about it, but what about making
> a bit more in the amqp domain ? It's mostly about being able to fire
> process instance over AMQP. We'd just have to make sure the listener
> handle launchitems as well as workitems. Then we should probably be
> able to let the listener handle "cancel items", requests for
> cancelling/killing processes.
>
> Just an idea.
>

Morning all

And an awesome idea at that. Maybe we need to define an interface in ruote
2.0 for listeners. Not thinking classical interface, more different JSON
formats for replies (sorted), launch items, cancel/kill items. This paves
the way for other listener/participant pairs to be easily written as well.

I want to revive the XMPP pair again for 2.0 as well, I'm sure we'll have
people who'd prefer to use that over AMQP. An HTTP listener (like in
ruote-kit as an example) would also benefit from this.

Big thanks to Jordan and Jason from my side as well !

Best


-- 
Kenneth Kalmer
[email protected]
http://opensourcery.co.za
@kennethkalmer

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" group.
to post : send email to [email protected]
to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected]
more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to