On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 2:56 AM, Enrico Bianco<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Aug 28, 12:30 pm, John Mettraux <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Do I guess correctly when I say that the error occurs on the remote
>> (engine) side ?
>
> Unfortunately, I can't get a full stack-trace. That was inside the
> ProcessError log entry. But I think your guess is correct.

Hello Enrico,

the "inside the ProcessError log" is a capital piece of information ;)

>> > I know that this particular participant never instantiates any new
>> > objects, so I think this might be happening when the participant
>> > itself is being instantiated and passed the workitem by ruote.
>>
>> Participants are instantiated at registration time.
>
> Strange, because if that's the case then why did the error occur
> during the process?  *puzzled*

Maybe the "participant was trying to instantiate something" and not
"something was trying to instantiate the participant". You gave us no
stacktrace, no real info about the target of the "new" method ;)

> But in good news, I did get the participants to work, in the end. I
> shuffled code around so that the DRb process was defining and
> registering them instead of the application. Somehow that "Just
> Works." Now I'm just finding that any expressions that use the
> scheduler are not getting fired.

Ouch. Kind of a edgy setup that you have.

Well done !

-- 
John Mettraux   -   http://jmettraux.wordpress.com

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" group.
to post : send email to [email protected]
to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected]
more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to