My bad. Didn't mean to use the word "ridiculous". Apologies!
On Sep 17, 10:08 pm, John Mettraux <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 11:46 PM, krish <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Say, I have a workflow that has a number of steps, a few of them being
> > concurrent. Some of these steps/participants talk to third party
> > products and the communication is asynchronous. They look at a
> > database field to check the status of those tasks as to whether or not
> > they finished and then move on.
>
> Hello Krish,
>
> I can than safely infer from the above paragraph that you wrote custom
> participants to perform those db-related tasks + communication with
> the third-party products.
>
> > I notice that each of these parallel
> > steps takes up 1 dedicated database connection. So, if I had 5
> > concurrent steps, it takes up 5 db connections per request. This seems
> > to be a bit ridiculous and more importantly, I am running into the
> > "ran out of connections" error. Any thoughts? Is this the expected
> > behavior?
>
> I don't know. YOU implemented it that way. Keep the "ridiculous"
> qualifier for your implementation.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> John Mettraux - http://jmettraux.wordpress.com
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" group.
to post : send email to [email protected]
to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected]
more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
