On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 11:35 PM, David <[email protected]> wrote: > > Well, that isn't quite the same thing, is it? For example, in order > to force a HashParticipant to relinquish its reference to a workitem, > I would have to hold a reference to the participant itself and invoke > its 'reply' method. I guess that's what you're suggesting ;-), > although I would have preferred to reply directly to the engine and > have the participant figure out which workitem to release.
Sorry, it's meant like that. Work is handed to participant, participant does his job, participant replies to engine. Best regards, -- John Mettraux - http://jmettraux.wordpress.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" group. to post : send email to [email protected] to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected] more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
