Nice! If ruote 2.0 is ready for a production environment, it would be nice to have soon official releases of it and its correlated tools.
Many thanks for your hard work Regards Matteo On Nov 3, 1:41 pm, Kenneth Kalmer <[email protected]> wrote: > 2009/11/3 John Mettraux <[email protected]> > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Gonzalo Suarez > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > What are the differences between ruote-http and ruote-kit? > > > We would like to find the best way to move from ruote-rest (ruote > > > 0.9.x) to ruote 2.0 engine + rest wrapping. > > > Hello, > > > ruote-kit is the one to watch for now. Kenneth is the leader for that > > project, ruote-http is much less ambitious, it's mostly an exercise > > for me, centered around how the HTTP interface should be. We intend to > > have the same interface, but ruote-kit will be the serious one, while > > ruote-http is only serious about the interface (it shares with > > ruote-kit). > > Hi Gonzalo > > John is spot on here. I'm using ruote-http as the interface for the JSON > side of ruote-kit, and building the UI on my own accord. John also needed to > experiment ahead of time to ensure the engine exposes some conveniences for > use in ruote-{http|kit}. > > I'll be pushing hard on the code in the coming weeks cause I need it for our > production environment as well as a client's. > > Best > > -- > Kenneth Kalmer > [email protected]http://opensourcery.co.za > @kennethkalmer --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" group. to post : send email to [email protected] to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected] more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
