On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 7:01 AM, Kenneth Kalmer <[email protected]> wrote: > > Just my 2c, but shouldn't we have a real process definition on > http:///ruote.rubyforge.org/ ? If an ISP intercepts unregistered > domains to display ads, then http://defs.example.com/ will resolve to > an HTML page and you get something like this: > > test_remote_definitions_allowed(FtProcessDefinitionTest) > [/Users/kenneth/Code/FOSS/ruote/ruote/test/functional/ > ft_22_process_definitions.rb:43:in `test_remote_definitions_allowed'
OK, point taken. http://github.com/jmettraux/ruote/commit/bb11c3908f6d41f7ca5be1892098b9edb398b07d Thanks a lot ! -- John Mettraux - http://jmettraux.wordpress.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" group. to post : send email to [email protected] to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected] more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
