On Nov 19, 8:09 pm, John Mettraux <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Enrico Bianco <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Will this be fixed in ruote 2.0?
>
> Hello,
>
> yes it is.
>
> > My interest in using
> > ProcessParticipant is to make my process definitions a bit more
> > "dynamic" by breaking a large process into smaller processes, which
> > may be individually modified.
>
> See for example :
>
>  http://github.com/jmettraux/ruote/blob/master/test/functional/eft_5_s...
>  http://ruote.rubyforge.org/exp/subprocess.html
>
> Please note the many possibilities.
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> John Mettraux   -  http://jmettraux.wordpress.com


Modifying a subprocess in a process definition won't affect the flow
of a currently running process instance, right?

The intent is to avoid having to rewrite/replace expressions in
currently running process instances as much as possible because that
would be incredibly difficult to pull off quickly and reliably in a
production deployment. Different instances of the same process
definition might be at different steps and need different changes,
making it difficult to automate.

I will spend some more time discussing with the stakeholders of my
project what the nature and frequency of the changes to our processes
might be and try to come to a reasonable solution but what I'm
understanding here is that if we need to change the flow (not just the
variables) of a process in-flight, then we have no choice but to
dissect the instance and replace some of its expressions.

Thank you,
Enrico

-- 
you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" group.
to post : send email to [email protected]
to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected]
more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en

Reply via email to