On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 6:55 AM, John Mettraux <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 12:45:34AM +0200, Kenneth Kalmer wrote: > > > > The upcoming ruote-amqp-2.1.6 & daemon-kit-0.1.8rc3 are now talking to > each > > other again just fine, thanks to David Austin, John & Eric for getting > the > > debugging and fixing done. > > Hello Kenneth, > > quick note, what about ruote-amqp 2.1.10 ? Are you working with ruote 2.1.6 > ? > > I try to go hand in hand with ruote and all the ruote-xxx. Wdyt ? Correct, pardon my sloppiness with this one, fixed http://github.com/kennethkalmer/ruote-amqp/commit/4270747f6f95cefbfdbfbaf65edef0959db1e92c > I'd say the local part (as opposed to the remote part) of your participant > should receive the workitem back and raise an error. > > I've been trying to gather an example at : > > > http://github.com/jmettraux/ruote-beanstalk/blob/ruote2.1/lib/ruote/beanstalk/participant.rb > > http://github.com/jmettraux/ruote-beanstalk/blob/ruote2.1/lib/ruote/beanstalk/receiver.rb > > but I still have to implement/provide the #raise_error method so that such > remote errors can be replayed (via a re-dispatch). Still some work for me in > ruote itself. > > Stay tuned > Can't wait ! This is exactly the approach I was going for... Best -- Kenneth Kalmer [email protected] http://opensourcery.co.za @kennethkalmer -- you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" group. to post : send email to [email protected] to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected] more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en
