On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 10:58:47PM -0700, Nathan Stults wrote: > > It helps a lot, thank you. I don't actually find the decision participant > more readable in simple cases because the business rule is buried in the > participant implementation. I like the idea of decision tables for more > complex cases though. However, the ruby eval syntax you provided will get me > going for now. Is there a decent expression evaluator library around for > ruby ? I have only run across one so far, but it is GPL licensed.
Sorry, begin curious, which expression evaluator is this ? > I come from .net and they are everywhere because there is no possibility of a > language level "eval." But sometimes for expressing human readable business > rules a simple sandboxed expression language really fits the bill. Maybe it > is finally time to take Treetop for a spin. I tend to use ruby directly to express business rules, with a bit of eval/metaprogramming/dslery sometimes. Cheers, -- John Mettraux - http://jmettraux.wordpress.com -- you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" group. to post : send email to [email protected] to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected] more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en
