On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 09:15:30AM -0700, Eric Platon wrote: > > It is clear that calling #launch initializes a new process and thus > produces the expected behavior (meaning no bug), but I was actually > wondering whether #launch should not be "resume-aware" through the > storage. Not sure what is worth right now. Your extended quickstart is > sound and clear to me, but I feel that it could be more compact: The > storage could be used as a memory across runs, instead of adding a > wfid file. I mean, it looks less elegant than just relying on the > storage, notably when using FsStorage. > > That's maybe just me, and it would be a significant rewrite. Still > learning! Going forward. Thanks again for your prompt support!
Hello Eric, I've been (slowly) preparing something about that : http://gist.github.com/597086 I hope to finish it by tomorrow. It's true that the wfid file trick is not adapted to environments where engines in different Ruby runtimes launch such "unique" processes, hence my launch_single() work. Stay tuned, -- John Mettraux - http://jmettraux.wordpress.com -- you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" group. to post : send email to [email protected] to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected] more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en
