On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 12:38:15PM +0100, Mauro wrote:
> On 8 November 2010 10:10, John Mettraux <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > I'm still waiting for the answers to my questions, but, meanwhile, does 
> > this process definition make sense ?
> >
> > https://gist.github.com/667513
> >
> > ---8<---
> > # I've to make an application to monitor the installation and
> > # replacement of all the PCs in my company.
> > #
> > # The PCs to be replaced are a few hundred.
> > #
> > # In practice, the work should take place as follows:
> > # a number of officers receiving some cards.
> > #
> > # Following interviews with users of PCs, the cards are compiled, eg by
> > # including a list of software that the user needs and that must be
> > # allocated in the new pc replacing the old, or by entering the name of
> > # the machine must be configured in the new, the date and time the user
> > # says to be eligible for when you must replace the PC, etc.. etc..
> > #
> > # Once you fill out these cards are viewed by a person and delivered to
> > # the company responsible for the replacement and installation of new
> > # pcs.
> > #
> > # During this work, replacement of new PCs can arise wrong, for example,
> > # the user will not be found, or some problem occurs during installation
> > # and other contingencies of any kind.
> > #
> > # If the work is done, the company regularly inform the responsible the
> > # ok, otherwise the work is suspended or canceled or postponed
> > # at another time.
> 
> Yes that's right.

OK, but my question was : does the process definition (not the requirement I 
copy-pasted from your mail to the Ruby-on-Rails mailing list) make sense (to 
you) ?

-- 
John Mettraux - http://jmettraux.wordpress.com

-- 
you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" group.
to post : send email to [email protected]
to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected]
more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en

Reply via email to