Torsten wrote: > John Mettraux wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 04:50:07AM -0800, rebo wrote: > > > > > > Must be something to do with that, as changing > > > > > > class SetExpression < FlowExpression > > > names :set, :unset > > > > > > to > > > > > > class SetExpression < FlowExpression > > > names :setf, :unset > > > > > > within fe_set.rb works with or without the sinatra gem in the > > > gemfile. (obviously using setf instead of set.) So some kind of > > > conflict on the set method.... > > > > Hello, > > > > I went on an added an 'rset' alias for the set expression : > > > > > > https://github.com/jmettraux/ruote/commit/801afe5c932c7b1e176f9e2a62d0546c79e09d14 > > > > Went for 'r[uote]set' and not 'setf' since set can set variables and fields. > > Nonetheless, sinatra's set shouldn't pollute the global namespace in > ruote-kit. I'll investigate that as soon as I've time for that.
There's a fix in https://github.com/tosch/ruote-kit/commit/00381b3ebe774fc37af0eae99bc6f149e1d51618 @rebo: Could you test if you may use 'set' in process definitions with that fix? Thanks again for the report, Torsten -- you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" group. to post : send email to [email protected] to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected] more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en
