Yep, it also is being used as a live representation of the process
state much in the same way ruote-fluo does with canvas in RuoteKit.

Of course html elements are less versatile than drawing direct to
canvas but with a bit of css I can get it looking quite nice and
understandable.

Initially I started writing a human readable description of the
process separately from the process definition, however I quickly
found this took a while and really was a duplication of the
information held within the pdef, any pdef changes meant re-writing
the human readable text.  By attaching  a :description attribute to
each command in the pdef I can quickly annotate each step.  These
nicely survive any logic or order changes within the pdef.

On Feb 3, 2:40 am, John Mettraux <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 07:40:00AM -0800, rebo wrote:
>
> > Had to do quite a bit of rendering to html of process definitions
> > lately, so extracted out the formatter i've been using.
>
> >https://github.com/rebo/Simple-Ruote-Formatter
>
> > Its missing loads of ruote commands and the hamlFormatter example is
> > largely dependant upon my processs definition style but hopefully can
> > help someone.
>
> Hello Rebo,
>
> nice idea !
>
> Are you using it to document your process definitions ? When people are 
> browsing your definition portfolio ?
>
> I will link to it from the website.
>
> Many thanks,
>
> --
> John Mettraux -http://jmettraux.wordpress.com

-- 
you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" group.
to post : send email to [email protected]
to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected]
more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en

Reply via email to