Thanks for the hard work John. I had a look at the changes you made to the docs yesterday and it looks great.
-- Raphael. On Feb 25, 2011, at 5:37 AM, John Mettraux <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 02:20:45PM +0900, John Mettraux wrote: >> >> On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 05:52:10PM -0800, Raphael Simon wrote: >>> >>> This definitely fits the bill. I'm looking forward to the filter attribute >>> as this is probably going to be how we will be mostly using filters (in the >>> spirit of mapping 'inputs' and 'outputs' to the workitem). I'm thinking the >>> standalone expression is great to do validation (e.g. at the beginning of >>> the workflow and all sub-workflows) while the attribute is what to use to do >>> the mapping for each participant that needs it. >> >> sorry for the late reply : the :filter attribute is in. >> >> >> https://github.com/jmettraux/ruote/blob/e5952b53957642b443327761203f949015710398/test/functional/ft_56_filter.rb >> >> It only understands filter passed via variables for now (I'll add filter >> participants) later. >> >> Please tell me if it fits your bill and how I could improve it. >> >>> I also like the fact that the filter mechanism is easy to use (via >>> Ruote::Filter) since I'm thinking our participants will use this directly to >>> validate the incoming workitem (don't know if it's overkill but at some >>> level this is nicely independent of everything else and could even live in >>> its own gem, rufus-validate anyone?) >> >> +1 for using Ruote::Filter from your participants. >> >> rufus-validate : why not, thinking about it, maybe after I release ruote >> 2.2.0 > > Hello, > > I've added participants as valid filters for the :filter attribute > > > https://github.com/jmettraux/ruote/commit/ceae194e14447ce857bce996fcac7913adb9b30c > > https://github.com/jmettraux/ruote/commit/4e31fb648e963893389351f0fa7aa3e328bdbf8e > > I think I'm done with the filters (expression and attribute) for now. > > It's documented at > > http://ruote.rubyforge.org/exp/filter.html > http://ruote.rubyforge.org/common_attributes.html#filter > > I haven't implemented the 'record' feature found in the 'filter' expression > for the :filter attribute. It doesn't seem necessary, in other words, > validation filters are probably not necessary for filtered sections. > > I hope to release 2.2.0 very soon. > > > Best regards, > > -- > John Mettraux - http://jmettraux.wordpress.com > > -- > you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" > group. > to post : send email to [email protected] > to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected] > more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en -- you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" group. to post : send email to [email protected] to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected] more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en
