On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 06:28:27PM -0700, Pedro Teixeira wrote: > > Just starting to use ruote, and it seems great. Just want to confirm: > the active-record storage [1] is outdated, right? > > [1] https://github.com/enricob/ruote-activerecord
Hello Pedro, welcome to ruote's mailing list. Yes, unfortunately, it's outdated. > I'd would like to have ruote share the same connection with > ActiveRecord for transactions. I guess the sequel project could be > adapted to re-use a current AR connection, does it sound like a bad > idea? > > I'll start using the sequel separately, perhaps I'll have no issue > with having to rollback manually. It could work. It sounds like an idea to explore. Another idea would be to use ruote-sequel (or ruote-dm) for normal ruote operations and an active-record model for workitems. Somehow a rails application interacts mostly with ruote via the engine's launch/cancel methods and the engine.storage_participant methods (for workitems). You could bypass the storage_participant and use the active-record model for workitems (to query for workitems)... Ah wait, you'd still need the reply method to use active-record and not sequel... Not so straightforward. Maybe we need a ruote-activerecord for ruote > 2.2.x Sorry for the lack of a clear answer. Best regards, -- John Mettraux - http://jmettraux.wordpress.com -- you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" group. to post : send email to [email protected] to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected] more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en
