On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 04:40:02AM +0900, John Mettraux wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:57:55AM -0700, simcha wrote: > > > > Yes but than you need to put it somehow in the process right sth like: > > > > publish, :ver => '1' > > > > Don't know witch is better. I'm not sure if this is more consistent. > > When you have this ver in process definition than to be consistent we > > need: > > > > ["workflow_name","workflow_revision", > > "participant_name_and_optionally_revision"] > > ["workflow_name", "participant_name_and_optionally_revision"] > > ["participant_name_and_optionally_revision"] > > throw error when participant_name exist in any stage before but > > revision not, or am I wrong? > > you're right, let's get back to your initial idea. I will implement something > tomorrow.
Days fly. I didn't forget you. Here is an initial implementation : https://github.com/jmettraux/ruote/commit/9b8e943b1b1de0fc0834c1efda1a005d16575f59 It lacks #cancel, #accept? and co for now, but I should be able to add them soon. Feel free to criticize, suggest, ... Best regards, -- John Mettraux - http://jmettraux.wordpress.com -- you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" group. to post : send email to [email protected] to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected] more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en
