On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 05:20:08PM +0900, John Mettraux wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 08:01:00AM +0200, Kenneth Kalmer wrote:
> >
> > I'll have to layer it up and see. I just looked at a current
> > ruote-amqp 2.2.x project and I'm using amqp 0.7.0 with ruote-amqp, and
> > amqp 0.6.7 in the remote participant and it works. I'll have a coffee
> > while I think this through, maybe I can bump ruote-amqp and daemon-kit
> > to use 0.8.0.
> >
> > I'll use the ping-pong example to test this, if it works well we just
> > need to coordinate the version bump of ruote-amqp with David. I'll
> > ping the daemon-kit list and the new contributors over there about the
> > 0.8 rc as well.
>
> Hello,
>
> yesterday I tried to move ruote-amqp to Amqp 0.7.1 but it was generally
> broken, 0.7.1 being too close to 0.8.0.
>
> Hartog told me Amqp 0.8.x was an excellent thing. They're reorganizing their
> stuff "the right way".
>
> Then I had this exchange on Twitter
>
> https://twitter.com/#!/rubyamqp/status/73727111336181761
> https://twitter.com/#!/rubyamqp/status/73727700958846976
> https://twitter.com/#!/rubyamqp/status/73728089217187840
> https://twitter.com/#!/rubyamqp/status/73728660263276546
> https://twitter.com/#!/rubyamqp/status/73729186728120320
>
> Shouldn't be too much work to go 0.8, but since you have quite a consequent
> infra on 0.7.0, better to have you on the board.
>
Took a lil' trip down memory lane.
The first questions that pop in to my mind are:
- what do the logs of the ping and pong daemon say
- what does `rabbitmqctl list_queues` say? (Perhaps you're listening
on the wrong queue)
Grtz,
Hartog.
--
you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" group.
to post : send email to [email protected]
to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected]
more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en
