On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 08:12:37PM +0200, Mario Camou wrote: > I see, so search instead of look up in the Hash. We *do* have some response > time limits so I will have to run some benchmarks to see if this is adequate > given our load.
Hello Mario, understood. Maybe you could combine the your current approach with my last proposition. The in-memory hash could be created by scanning the workitems when ruote starts up. > How about the other part? Not using a Persistent Storage? Does that sound at > all reasonable, or am I completely out of it? So all the process data will stay in-memory, you could even use the search approach, it would be fast anyway. If you can afford to lose all the data, why not ? Best regards, -- John Mettraux - http://jmettraux.wordpress.com -- you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" group. to post : send email to [email protected] to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected] more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en
