On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 03:06:41PM -0800, Nathan Stults wrote: > Probably a good idea to try from scratch with the MongoDB adapter. In > my tests our MongoDB storage was almost exactly 2x slower than Redis, > with loads of varying sizes, but there isn't a good reason for this to > be the case that I can think of, so we are doing something wrong I > think.
Hello Nathan, isn't Redis faster than MongoDB (having less features and working mostly in memory) ? They're really two different beasts. > (Ruote doesn't call "get_many" for expressions during the normal > course of executing a flow does it? ) No, it doesn't. > I spent a few more hours reading the code for the expressions this > weekend, and I finally think I have a complete grasp of how everything > fits together at a high level. I believe there is a way to dramatically > improve the performance and scalability characteristics of Ruote without > squeezing more performance out of the storage or tinkering with when an > expression chooses to persist itself just by changing the way Ruote > processes expressions a little bit. I'm going to play with this in my > fork and if it bears fruit, I'll ask you to take a peek and see what you > think. Looking forward to it ! Thanks. -- John Mettraux - http://lambda.io/processi -- you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" group. to post : send email to [email protected] to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected] more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en
