On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 07:28:46AM -0800, R Law wrote:
>
> > What about making those steps explicit in the process definition ?
> >
> > ---8<---
> > sequence do
> > copy_info_over
> > human :unless => '${info}'
> > end
> > --->8---
>
> Is "copy_info_over" a participant?
Hello,
it could be participant or a subprocess. To make it more definite:
---8<---
sequence do
participant 'copy_info_over'
participant 'human' :unless => '${info}'
end
--->8---
> If so I still have to implement a
> custom participant, right?
Yes.
> Is there any advantage to having many
> participants that handle small tasks over having fewer that handle
> bigger tasks?
Non-exhaustive lists:
Advantages:
- can be reused in multiple process definitions
- simpler to implement (easier to think about how to deal with cancel calls)
Disadvantages:
- process definition gets too detailed (but subprocesses can be used to keep
the flow readable)
Best regards,
--
John Mettraux - http://lambda.io/processi
--
you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" group.
to post : send email to [email protected]
to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected]
more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en
