On Wednesday, 29 February 2012 06:39:19 UTC+2, John Mettraux wrote: > > This "RabbitMQ between ruote and the hard-working participants" pattern > seems > > to be used by lots of people. >
I've noticed that as well and I'm wondering whether the proposed implementation I am working on might be a bit misguided.... I have all the heavy lifting done in the participants themselves, with (possibly) multiple Ruote worker daemons (possibly on different machines) all communicating via a shared MongoDB storage acting as the 'queue'. My initial experiments running on my laptop were successful but I'm worried I might be a bit too optimistic as to whether this is the right way to go. I cant' see any obvious downsides and it cuts out another piece of software to manage (RabbitMQ) but if I'm straying down the wrong path let met know! Farrel -- you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" group. to post : send email to [email protected] to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected] more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en
