After trimming the fat on the code (removing some participants and
on_error), I got some more interesting information:
===========================
=> == Ruote::ProcessStatus ==
wfid: 20130124-1835-jenigopo-kizotogu
name: approval_process
revision: 0.1
last_active: 2013-01-24 18:35:23.505421 UTC
launched_time: 2013-01-24 18:35:14.330578 UTC
expressions: 8
0!de7ded37c1855795de5ff56f896b2905!20130124-1835-jenigopo-kizotogu
| define
| _rev: "2"
| {"name"=>"approval_process", "revision"=>"0.1"}
| . child->
0_0!c5395919ffdd8f22159727e3bb48b190!20130124-1835-jenigopo-kizotogu
`-parent--> nil
0_0!c5395919ffdd8f22159727e3bb48b190!20130124-1835-jenigopo-kizotogu
| cursor
| _rev: "2"
| {}
| . child->
0_0_0!547f7120e9127f179aeb1c97868495ad!20130124-1835-jenigopo-kizotogu
`-parent-->
0!de7ded37c1855795de5ff56f896b2905!20130124-1835-jenigopo-kizotogu
0_0_0!547f7120e9127f179aeb1c97868495ad!20130124-1835-jenigopo-kizotogu
| sequence
| _rev: "2"
| {}
| . child->
0_0_0_0!6bce3c26e8468c7a9e2bafcce345a91c!20130124-1835-jenigopo-kizotogu
`-parent-->
0_0!c5395919ffdd8f22159727e3bb48b190!20130124-1835-jenigopo-kizotogu
0_0_0_0!6bce3c26e8468c7a9e2bafcce345a91c!20130124-1835-jenigopo-kizotogu
| concurrence
| _rev: "2"
| {"count"=>1}
| . child->
0_0_0_0_0!3130995817c1113d14abd9796ed39122!20130124-1835-jenigopo-kizotogu
| . child->
0_0_0_0_1!1863ea9f376abbc7e88bb6526d8c6df1!20130124-1835-jenigopo-kizotogu
| . child->
0_0_0_0_2!029450ea4733726c1bb2c022214a18b0!20130124-1835-jenigopo-kizotogu
| . child->
0_0_0_0_3!d1ff5dd3dd812f5cdacbd0069a4ce51f!20130124-1835-jenigopo-kizotogu
`-parent-->
0_0_0!547f7120e9127f179aeb1c97868495ad!20130124-1835-jenigopo-kizotogu
0_0_0_0_0!3130995817c1113d14abd9796ed39122!20130124-1835-jenigopo-kizotogu
| participant
| _rev: "3"
| {"approver_id"=>"1", "approval_step_id"=>"1",
"ref"=>"approval_step"}
`-parent-->
0_0_0_0!6bce3c26e8468c7a9e2bafcce345a91c!20130124-1835-jenigopo-kizotogu
0_0_0_0_1!1863ea9f376abbc7e88bb6526d8c6df1!20130124-1835-jenigopo-kizotogu
| participant
| _rev: "3"
| {"approver_id"=>"2", "approval_step_id"=>"1",
"ref"=>"approval_step"}
`-parent-->
0_0_0_0!6bce3c26e8468c7a9e2bafcce345a91c!20130124-1835-jenigopo-kizotogu
0_0_0_0_2!029450ea4733726c1bb2c022214a18b0!20130124-1835-jenigopo-kizotogu
| participant
| _rev: "3"
| {"approver_id"=>"3", "approval_step_id"=>"1",
"ref"=>"approval_step"}
`-parent-->
0_0_0_0!6bce3c26e8468c7a9e2bafcce345a91c!20130124-1835-jenigopo-kizotogu
0_0_0_0_3!d1ff5dd3dd812f5cdacbd0069a4ce51f!20130124-1835-jenigopo-kizotogu
| participant
| _rev: "2"
| {"approver_id"=>"4", "approval_step_id"=>"1",
"ref"=>"approval_step"}
`-parent-->
0_0_0_0!6bce3c26e8468c7a9e2bafcce345a91c!20130124-1835-jenigopo-kizotogu
schedules: 0
stored workitems: 3
initial workitem fields:
"approval_id": 23
variables:
"approval_process": ["0", ["define", {"name"=>"approval_process",
"revision"=>"0.1"}, [["
cursor", {}, [["sequence", {}, [["concurrence", {"count"=>1},
[["approval_step", {"approver_i
d"=>"1", "approval_step_id"=>"1"}, []], ["approval_step",
{"approver_id"=>"2", "approval_step
_id"=>"1"}, []], ["approval_step", {"approver_id"=>"3",
"approval_step_id"=>"1"}, []], ["appr
oval_step", {"approver_id"=>"4", "approval_step_id"=>"1"}, []]]],
["disburse_step", {}, []]]]
]]]]]
all_variables:
"0!de7ded37c1855795de5ff56f896b2905!20130124-1835-jenigopo-kizotogu":
{"approval_process"
=>["0", ["define", {"name"=>"approval_process", "revision"=>"0.1"},
[["cursor", {}, [["sequen
ce", {}, [["concurrence", {"count"=>1}, [["approval_step",
{"approver_id"=>"1", "approval_ste
p_id"=>"1"}, []], ["approval_step", {"approver_id"=>"2",
"approval_step_id"=>"1"}, []], ["app
roval_step", {"approver_id"=>"3", "approval_step_id"=>"1"}, []],
["approval_step", {"approver
_id"=>"4", "approval_step_id"=>"1"}, []]]], ["disburse_step", {},
[]]]]]]]]]}
errors: 1
***
0_0_0_0_3!d1ff5dd3dd812f5cdacbd0069a4ce51f!20130124-1835-jenigopo-kizotogu
:
action: dispatch
message: #<ActiveRecord::RecordNotFound: Couldn't find User with id=4
[WHERE "users"."del
eted_at" IS NULL]>
trace:
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/1.9.1/gems/activerecord-3.2.6/lib/active_record/relation/finder
_methods.rb:341:in `find_one'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/1.9.1/gems/activerecord-3.2.6/lib/active_record/relation/finder
_methods.rb:312:in `find_with_ids'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/1.9.1/gems/activerecord-3.2.6/lib/active_record/relation/finder
_methods.rb:107:in `find'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/1.9.1/gems/activerecord-3.2.6/lib/active_record/querying.rb:5:i
n `find'
/app/lib/approval_participant.rb:12:in `on_workitem'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/1.9.1/bundler/gems/ruote-1fd3945d6376/lib/ruote/svc/dispatch_po
ol.rb:199:in `block in participant_send'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/1.9.1/bundler/gems/ruote-1fd3945d6376/lib/ruote/svc/dispatch_po
ol.rb:195:in `each'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/1.9.1/bundler/gems/ruote-1fd3945d6376/lib/ruote/svc/dispatch_po
ol.rb:195:in `participant_send'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/1.9.1/bundler/gems/ruote-1fd3945d6376/lib/ruote/svc/dispatch_po
ol.rb:74:in `do_dispatch'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/1.9.1/bundler/gems/ruote-1fd3945d6376/lib/ruote/svc/dispatch_po
ol.rb:60:in `dispatch'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/1.9.1/bundler/gems/ruote-1fd3945d6376/lib/ruote/svc/dispatch_po
ol.rb:45:in `handle'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/1.9.1/bundler/gems/ruote-1fd3945d6376/lib/ruote/worker.rb:381:i
n `process'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/1.9.1/bundler/gems/ruote-1fd3945d6376/lib/ruote/worker.rb:195:i
n `process_msgs'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/1.9.1/bundler/gems/ruote-1fd3945d6376/lib/ruote/worker.rb:243:i
n `step'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/1.9.1/bundler/gems/ruote-1fd3945d6376/lib/ruote/worker.rb:94:in
`run'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/1.9.1/bundler/gems/ruote-1fd3945d6376/lib/ruote/worker.rb:105:i
n `block in run_in_thread'
details:
deviations:
fields:
"approval_id": 23
"params": {"approver_id"=>"4", "approval_step_id"=>"1",
"ref"=>"approval_step"}
"dispatched_at": "2013-01-24 18:35:23.214933 UTC"
===========================
I guess I'm getting the exception in the log since on_error is removed.
Additional notes:
- The User record in question has existed for about a day - I can find it
via console
- Using Postgres on Heroku
- Exception appears to be referencing slightly older code -- if I alter a
participant and re-deploy, could the worker still be referencing an older
version of a participant?
With this new clue, I think it has to be something more straightforward
(and probably something stupid I'm missing!)
Cheers,
E
--
--
you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" group.
to post : send email to [email protected]
to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected]
more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en
