You are right John, there is no duplication of work. the counter is incremented properly. But if you look in your SQL table, you will see that there are couple clean_car participants in the table with expid 0_1 on all of them. I dont think worker picks those participants, maybe only last one, thats why there is no duplication, but the expression tree does not match to process pdef, and to some degree does not make sense to the worker. Maybe I am not quite groking what SQL records should look like and that's normal?
I just committed changes to script to match my setup. I ran my modified script with locking and without locking and what i found was that in both cases workitem counter was incremented correctly. The difference was that with locking, process expression looked exactly like PDEF in SQL table, but without locking, there were 5 extra clean_car participants in SQL table. Thanks, Iuri -- -- you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" group. to post : send email to [email protected] to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected] more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ruote" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
