Thanks Danny.  If we decide to go with ruote, I will definitely be 
contacting you to see if we can work together on this.  I should know soon.

Best Regards,
Denis

On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 5:11:13 PM UTC-5, Danny Fullerton wrote:
>
>  Hello Denis,
>
> Yes, this is the intent. 
>
> This Audit Trail is an essential part of a software (open-source) we 
> intend to release in November. 
>
> Briefly, we need to be able to display an entire process while it's active 
> and when it's completed. We can presently visualize the entire processes 
> with workitem(s) filled in the past, current active workitem and future 
> workitem(s) by using this Audit Trail and mixing in the active workitem.
>
> If feasible, I would prefer if it could be an external gem others could 
> uses. 
>
> If this sounds interesting, you can contact me personally and we could 
> setup something to share this code and work together.
>
> regards,
>
> -- 
> Danny Fullerton
> Founder
> Mantor Organization
>
> On 13-06-19 05:25 PM, [email protected] <javascript:> wrote:
>  
> Hi Danny,
>
> Thanks for the quick reply.  The support on this mailing list has been 
> fantastic so far.
>
> Regarding your Audit Trail observer, is this something you are developing 
> with plans to release to the community?  If we decide to go with ruote (and 
> that is looking likely), I would be willing to help you with this, since 
> this is something we'll need as well (assuming your vision of Audit Trail 
> observer line up with our needs).
>
> Best Regards,
> Denis
>
> On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 4:11:51 PM UTC-5, Danny Fullerton wrote: 
>>
>>  Hello Denis,
>>
>> Welcome to Ruote's mailing list.
>>
>> I'll try to answer to the best of my knowledge but John will be able to 
>> complete if necessary.
>>
>> 1. Yes, I seen some discussion on the mailing list about this. You should 
>> take a look at re_apply and the test cases ( 
>> http://ruote.rubyforge.org/process_administration.html#re_applying).
>>
>> 2. Yes but I'll leave this to John.
>>
>> 3. The moment a process is completed it gets erased. I believe the Audit 
>> Trail observer I'm working on (or your own implementation) should be able 
>> to answer this. Basically, once completed, the entire process tree and 
>> applied workitems gets saved iin an archive.
>>
>> 4. Yes, you should take a look at Ruote-kit which shows the current 
>> position of a process.
>>
>> 5. I'll leave this to John.
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> -- 
>> Danny Fullerton
>> Founder
>> Mantor Organization
>>
>> On 13-06-19 04:56 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>  
>> Hi,
>>
>> We are currently evaluating ruote against a set of requirements we came 
>> up with that a prospective workflow engine solution must meet.  So far 
>> ruote is stacking up pretty well against our requirements, but we have a 
>> few requirements that I am trying to figure out how we would satisfy them 
>> either using ruote out-of-the-box, or via some code we write that sits on 
>> top/alongside of ruote.
>>
>> Can ruote do the following things, and if so, how?
>>
>> 1. Ability for an admin to set the current step/expression of a process 
>> instance (and then resume).  Here's the use case: something is broken in 
>> production that needs to be fixed, so pause the process instance, deploy a 
>> fix, and then resume the process at a specific step/expression.
>>
>> 2. Ability to assign a step in a process to a user, and to be able to 
>> show the user the steps assigned to him that currently require action on 
>> his part (i.e. steps in running processes that are waiting for a reply to 
>> continue).
>>
>> 3. Ability to query for completed process instances (e.g. get a list of 
>> all the processes that ran between 6/1/2013 and 6/15/2013).
>>
>> 4. Ability to query for the execution history of a process instance (i.e. 
>> be able to see what part of a process has been executed and where the 
>> process is currently at).
>>
>> 5. Ability to tag process instances and search/query based on those tags.
>>
>> I realize that I may not be providing enough context to make those 
>> requirements clear, so please let me know if something is unclear and I 
>> will try to explain our needs better.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Denis
>>
>> -- 
>> -- 
>> you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" 
>> group.
>> to post : send email to [email protected]
>> to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected]
>> more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "ruote" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>  
>>  
>>
>>
>>  -- 
> -- 
> you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" 
> group.
> to post : send email to [email protected] <javascript:>
> to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected]<javascript:>
> more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en
> --- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "ruote" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>  
>  
>
>
>  

-- 
-- 
you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" group.
to post : send email to [email protected]
to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected]
more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ruote" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to