On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 12:13:15PM -0700, [email protected] wrote: > > (...) > > Does anyone know if this is the correct/intended behavior, that there isn't > a workitem in this situation? It feels like a workitem should be > available, but I'm still relatively new to ruote, so perhaps I'm missing > something in my understanding of how workitems are handled by ruote. If > this is proper behavior, is there any way else to know within > Ruote::ProcessObserver#on_error_intercepted what flow expression caused the > error?
Hello, I don't think this was the intended behaviour. I somehow fixed it: https://github.com/jmettraux/ruote/commit/5235f13b7d87dc9c6874ef73fd320fc2f238418c I'd somehow recommend using Ruote::Observer instead of Ruote::ProcessObserver. it's closer to the metal. Thanks for reporting this issue. Best regards, -- John Mettraux - http://lambda.io/jmettraux -- -- you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" group. to post : send email to [email protected] to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected] more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ruote" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
