Thank you very much!  I hope to contribute once I get over the newbie 
learning curve.


On Wednesday, August 14, 2013 5:02:01 PM UTC-5, John Mettraux wrote:
>
>
> > 2013/8/14 <[email protected] <javascript:>> 
> > 
> > > Hello Ruote community, 
>
> Hello Eric, 
>
> welcome to the ruote mailing list. 
>
> > > (...) 
> > > 
> > > Attached is a sample script which demonstrates this behavior.  It can 
> be 
> > > run in 2 ways: 
> > > 
> > > > ruby ruote-workitem-field-update-test.rb process 
> > > > ruby ruote-workitem-field-update-test.rb update 
> > > 
> > > Passing the 'process' argument shows the expected behavior.  Passing 
> the 
> > > 'update' argument shows the unexpected behavior (the workitem value is 
> > > nil).  It seems like the storage_participants :[] method is returning 
> a 
> > > cached, stale workitem.  What am I doing wrong?  Am I using ruote 
> > > incorrectly? 
>
> Ah, ok. the update fails. I've modified your code so that it makes it 
> apparent: 
>
>   https://gist.github.com/jmettraux/3d17e343305f5650a1ea 
>
> It's OK to subclass the storage participant (I think I even advised it 
> sometimes on this mailing list...) So your could should work. 
>
> Here is a fix: 
>
>   https://github.com/jmettraux/ruote/commit/e4d7b00 
>
> It makes sure what is returned by StorageParticipant#workitem has the 
> current 
> "_rev" so that the following update is successful. 
>
> (I will make sure thate StorageParticipant#update updates the _rev as 
> well, 
> so that update can be called multiple times in a row. 
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 10:07:14PM +0200, Hartog De Mik wrote: 
> > 
> > I use storage participant to ...store stuff, logicly you could decide to 
> > instantly reply, but imho the essence is not to reply and let the 
> process 
> > sit right there, until some external force re-applies or proceeds. 
> > 
> > I am a naughty boy and I let the external force update my workitems from 
> > outside the process (yes; I know this may be seen as evil) 
>
> This is the vanilla use case, evil vanilla? ;-) 
>
>
> Best regards, I hope this helps, 
>
> -- 
> John Mettraux   -   http://lambda.io/jmettraux 
>
>

-- 
-- 
you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" group.
to post : send email to [email protected]
to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected]
more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ruote" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to