On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 06:42:00AM -0800, Eitan Yanovsky wrote: > > I also tried converting the or into and and not (using demorgan > transformation logic) and it didn't help. > I can try nested if but I wish to avoid this workarounds and understand why > this doesn't work as expected.
Hello, I'm sorry that's a limitation of the "is [not] set", "is [not] empty" set of tools. I've always meant to go for something better but haven't found the time. They're meant to be used standalone (not with an "or" or an "and"). I guess the nested way is OK. Sorry again, -- John Mettraux - http://lambda.io/jmettraux -- -- you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" group. to post : send email to [email protected] to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected] more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ruote" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
