Hi John
Thanks for the quick reply - I added some more detailed info here:
https://gist.github.com/stackdump/217b2c87f62540fa4807
I didn't include the process that logs f:machine before the sequence, but
you can see the log entry just after the sequence begins running.
The machine hash already contained a remote_id:
2014-02-28 19:20:26 Env: 5310bda1e1d14826e00000bc Thread: 22454140 -
Participants::Log: {"CREATING MACHINE"=>{"availability_zone"=>"nova",
"flags"=>{"migrate"=>true, "wipe"=>true}, "flavor_id"=>"18",
"image_id"=>"de0bf0b8-8f16-4e0e-bc23-cfc27c52283c",
"machine_id"=>"5310be96749f06d9ef000051", "name"=>"mlb14-goo-balancer4",
"puppet_role"=>"role::sdod::playerconnect",
"remote_id"=>"020235ef-9541-46b3-9f05-b1832daf440d",
"security_groups"=>["server.balancer"],
"services"=>{"playcore"=>{"balancer"=>{}}}, "state"=>"ECO_CREATED",
"tenant_name"=>"GPAD_SD1",
"user_data"=>"application=mlb14&environment=production pe_eco_environment=ote
pe_eco_message_broker=eco-ote-messaging.eco.usw1.cld.scea.com",
"_id"=>"5310e13de1d1483dd90000c0"}, "ref"=>"log"}
Thanks for the debugging tip - I'll keep investigating.
--Thanks
Matt York
On Friday, February 28, 2014 2:52:08 PM UTC-8, John Mettraux wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 02:41:59PM -0800, Matthew York wrote:
> >
> > So some strangeness today:
> >
> > I have a bit of process def that has this:
> >
> > sequence :unless => '$f:machine.remote_id' do
> >
> > I've encountered a scenario where this comparison fails - from my logs I
> > see a dump of f:machine that does have 'remote_id' populated just before
> > this process is run.
> > Somehow the sequence is still executed.
> >
> > Note that this particular process is nested under a concurrent_iterator
> -
> > and in the other branches 29 other machines (properly) skipped this
> > sequence, but one did not.
> >
> > I've looked over some of the older posts about comparisons, and I don't
> > think i'm doing anything too strange here.
> >
> > Do you think this would be an issue with ruote-mon? ( which I'm still
> using
> > with 1 worker )
> > I haven't tried to replicate this issue using another storage.
> >
> > I'm just now starting to attempt to replicate this issue with a simple
> test
> > case, but something tells me this isn't simple.
>
> Hello Matt,
>
> I'm sorry, from the information you are giving me, I cannot say much.
>
> What is remote_id right before the sequence gets hold of it, could it be
> ""
> or "false"? The comparison/unless code isn't that smart, it takes a
> decision,
> but not a random decision.
>
> You could had some debug output around line 368 or
> lib/ruote/exp/flow_expression.rb or in the apply? method of class
> Condition
> in lib/ruote/exp/condition.rb to see what's ending up there...
>
> I hope this will help.
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> John
>
>
--
--
you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" group.
to post : send email to [email protected]
to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected]
more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"ruote" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
