Author: rmilecki
Date: 2015-12-07 19:38:20 +0100 (Mon, 07 Dec 2015)
New Revision: 47806

Modified:
   trunk/target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-4.1/400-mtd-bcm47xxpart-get-nvram.patch
Log:
brcm47xx: make bcm47xxpart patch apply after recent backports

Signed-off-by: Rafa?\197?\130 Mi?\197?\130ecki <[email protected]>

Modified: 
trunk/target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-4.1/400-mtd-bcm47xxpart-get-nvram.patch
===================================================================
--- trunk/target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-4.1/400-mtd-bcm47xxpart-get-nvram.patch 
2015-12-07 16:30:59 UTC (rev 47805)
+++ trunk/target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-4.1/400-mtd-bcm47xxpart-get-nvram.patch 
2015-12-07 18:38:20 UTC (rev 47806)
@@ -1,14 +1,14 @@
 --- a/drivers/mtd/bcm47xxpart.c
 +++ b/drivers/mtd/bcm47xxpart.c
-@@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ static int bcm47xxpart_parse(struct mtd_
-       int trx_part = -1;
+@@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ static int bcm47xxpart_parse(struct mtd_
        int last_trx_part = -1;
        int possible_nvram_sizes[] = { 0x8000, 0xF000, 0x10000, };
+       int err;
 +      bool found_nvram = false;
  
        /*
         * Some really old flashes (like AT45DB*) had smaller erasesize-s, but
-@@ -300,12 +301,23 @@ static int bcm47xxpart_parse(struct mtd_
+@@ -306,12 +307,23 @@ static int bcm47xxpart_parse(struct mtd_
                if (buf[0] == NVRAM_HEADER) {
                        bcm47xxpart_add_part(&parts[curr_part++], "nvram",
                                             master->size - blocksize, 0);
_______________________________________________
openwrt-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-commits

Reply via email to