Sergey Lapin wrote: > > There is interest in the RTL865x port in general. And your port > will be useful > > for people wanting to get something out of their devices. Later on, we > will > > still move to the 2.6 port when merged. > I'm among first ones who vote for 2.6, but 2.4 could be still temprorarily > be supported. I really don't want to see more 2.4 targets in OpenWrt, especially not the kind that requires blobs and doesn't even use the latest 2.4 version. Broadcom 2.4 is the last one, and at some point we really want to get rid of this crap. Maybe you should maintain this series in a separate git repository which is easy to sync with my clone of trunk. I'm OK with merging things like bixutil, though.
- Felix _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
